This makes no sense. A candidate can’t pay Facebook to spread lies if they admit that’s what they’re doing. But if they don’t explicitly admit it, Facebook will take their money to spread their lies? (There’s no easy way to fix paid digital microtargeting for political messages).https://twitter.com/donie/status/1189325948040220673 …
-
-
remember when
@StephenAtHome ran for president wonder what his platform on Zuck would be likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every move they make is the wrong one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the kind of unethical policy design that encourages disinformation as an agency in bad actors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why, it's almost like they're making choices based solely on the criteria of how to prop up the establishment while maximizing their profits. No actual principles are involved.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hmm. Why not use local, state or national bars around candidacy already in place ... e.g. for inclusion in debates and ballots? Defining “a serious candidate” (from a programming standpoint) is a lot easier from those rules that exist... than defining truth in advertising!
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Facebook is not good at thinking deeply because of the CEO. Dude should try finishing college.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
tech becomes a medium. even if they started in it for cults or paychecks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.