Facebook has at least arguably become a sufficiently important part of everyday speech that for it to ban X or Y is de facto a free speech question. It's not enough to compare it to banning someone from a newspaper - it's also like banning someone all newspapers, or from TV.
-
-
I believe that’s true if the limitation was because of their idea. But the limiting factors in the old mediums included space and time. I have a hard time seeing that practical limitation as a denial of rights.
-
Look how well deplatforming from just three—Facebook, YouTube, Twitter—works. It’s one thing to believe that the society may well be better off without A Jones in the public sphere, another to realize that’s an immense power being exercised mostly arbitrarily.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.