I'd be interested to hear what he has to say, certainly.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @laurenceb @sfmnemonic and
But here's the thing: as
@zeynep has pointed out (as have many others) the loss of this app is probably causing people in Hong Kong to be unexpectedly trapped in tear gas. While this interesting legal/policy situation plays out, what happens to them?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sfmnemonic @zeynep and
The claim from
@zeynep and others is that the primary users of this app aren't even protesters, they're people living their day to day lives, trying to avoid being caught up in a dangerous situation.0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sfmnemonic @zeynep and
I'm not claiming you have said anything positive about the PRC police. The problem, as you pointed out earlier, is that Apple may or may not be in a really difficult situation, and we can't actually determine the correct grounds on which to criticize it without clarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @laurenceb @sfmnemonic and
My concern is that the lack of clarity could be hurting people in Hong Kong. How do we advocate for these people while avoiding the pitfalls of promulgating false information.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sfmnemonic @laurenceb and
I absolutely reject that. When someone makes a wild claim, with no plausible support and when there's a plausible answer (pressured and sucking up) it's not solid "methodology" to give benefit of the doubt to the party making implausible claims and harming people in the process.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
With all such questions, deciding to "wait" on something when one side of the answer makes no sense and the other makes a lot of sense (and has facts on its side) is not responsible or cautious methodology, especially as harm is ongoing. No, no, no. Sorry, totally disagree.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @sfmnemonic @laurenceb and
I’m going to leave it here, but when one side is making implausible claims and not being transparent, and when there are other clear facts, please wait as long as the interested party making wild claims would like us to wait while harm his ongoing is not defensible. Ongoing harm!
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.