Right, but when asked, no official or authority stated there was a law that was violated. Apple couldn't or didn't cite a law. The police and authorities don't claim they made a request. Whatever the rule of law Apple might claim to follow, it's 100% opaque and misleading.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which law? He is assuming a use—and that assumption is unwarranted—and then claiming this use would make it in violation of Hong Kong law. That’s not a lawful obligation. That’s a string of assumptions that he’s using to make a decision. There is no court order. No law cited.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.