What do you think the entirety of social sciences, emerging mostly in the 19th century, grappling with the industrial revolution and modernization were about?!??!??? Machines, evolution of public and private life, work, society... You’re welcome.
-
-
In fact, the way you seem to think what we need is a catchy new name rather than understanding and confronting the historical and structural forces that intersected with economic incentives and technological developments to put us exactly where we are... Well.
-
Does anyone really think this was a genuine call for a new field of research or serious inquiry? If it was, then it incredibly naive or willfully ignorant and lazy -as all the replies suggest. If it wasn’t, then what was the real point? Branding, attention capture, ... well done!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At least 30 years ago Carnegie Mellon required all engineers to take a course re: intersection of technology & people from their Public Policy school. The grad school today offers many degrees that seem right in this zone:https://www.heinz.cmu.edu/about/public-policy-management …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hi Zeynep, huge fan of your work. I think that the challenge we face now is how deeply/intimately software & tech design can change the very landscape of such (classically studied) human interactions. That's new. We've not had polyjuice potion, and paper that responds to pen.
-
Over the last couple of years it's become apparent to me that the attention economy companies are forcing an evolution of homo sapiens to homo sapiens *digital*; and new extended phenotypes are running amok in this limitless memetic landscape.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.