They’ll get people to click yes. None of these consent directed methods work. People aren’t reading or understanding what’s going on. This is like asking people to be chemistry experts so they can test and manage to buy safe food. https://twitter.com/ashk4n/status/1093507102956490752 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A more public-goods/collective-threats approach. Consent at the individual level and the risks/downsides, mostly at the aggregate level, are not matched. Neither are we that informed. Who can predict, really, what machine learning will be able to do with *that* data in 10 years.
0 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Privacy is the bedrock of integrity and dignity. ML comes in because I don't think it's possible to be informed of what exactly we are consenting to when what the data can do is rapidly changing. It's moving very fast, compared to our notions and protections.
0 replies
1 retweet
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.