Also, the means to organize and restructure information is also way to restructure power relationships. There is pretty good literature on all this even from the 70s, early 80s. It’s more visibly and fully playing out now. But still so early!
-
-
Show this thread
-
Right, though a simplistic and demagogic “but math” will be used by many people. His “take” is unsophisticated and wrong. She’s making a coherent and correct point. He can’t even quote her correctly.
https://twitter.com/gthanku/status/1088235104319795201 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe good to cite some sources for those claims for the less math-woke among us.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Algorithms are very susceptible to what gets left in and what gets left out. If it is wrong, it is going to be formidably and unrelentingly wrong. and maybe hard to fix too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can make the/any point without quoting a bad faith hack.
-
No, you can’t. Newton’s Law of Gravity was (and is) a bad faith hack. It’s good enough for government work though, and the bar is much lower in political discourse. That’s why a restoration of respect for expertise, and punishment for experts who prostitute theirs, is needed. 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Listen to the video. She does not say "which are driven by math"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed, we need to go beyond the usual math to consider individuals differences including linguistic, cultural and other reasons people are different. Fortunately this is possible.
-
Where to start (intuitively and conceptually rather than technically), please?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.