So there were.... 3 mainstream media articles, out the many TENS OF THOUSANDS of articles published on the 2016 campaign, that embedded Russian troll tweets? I'm afraid that's not really helping your argument.https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1075845985182441472 …
But you wouldn't dismiss it because it is a small percentage of the body mass is my metaphor here. More is worse can be true while simultaneously tiny is harmless is not true.
-
-
My reading of the argument is in the absence of proof we're talking heuristics. With infections, bacterial load much more often than not is a great measure of effect size. You belittled tweet frequency with a wrong analogy to bacterial load, which actually proves Nate's point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Let me know if you want to argue against a stronger strawperson and I'll get back to it.