no, but I see people with far more expertise than me have been explaining it to you
-
-
It is the slickest snake oil. I mean what is the precision and recall of their machine learning algo? What training data did they use? How do they detect false positives and improve the algo? What happens to the poor people who lose business because of FPs?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Interpretability of ML feels like a red herring. More central issue is that it would be impossible for humans to screen social media in this way. AI enables massively more surveillance...
-
Which was my initial point! Steve wanted to discuss interpretabilty again because of a passing comment in the thread.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
