Funny. These districts (including IA-4) didn’t magically become competitive. It’s just the “Official Democrats” have been mostly ignoring them, and thus blind to the intense grassroots effort underway. So they didn’t get much polling. And then there’s a poll and everyone’s
.https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1059126010292195329 …
The official party tried hard to re-nominate Hartman, who may be a wonderful person, but ran & lost before *and* underperformed even Clinton in 2016. After redistrcting PA-11 got tougher, so Hartman bolted to run elsewhere again with support of party, but even botched signatures!
-
-
She may well lose, given how tough a district that is for a D, but that is part of my point... Look how close someone got, even there, a +22 R district, once they tried. Meanwhile, re-nominating the person who lost, and with such a giant margin, was the official plan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.