Any de-centralized gatekeeping will occasionally fail. Is the whole thing a fraud? Are fields epistemically bankrupt? Need a very different set of actions/arguments. They faked data, barely got past a few, dishonestly use rejects as if it supports their arguments. Wrong track.
No they misrepresented what they did. They use data fraud, act like it reveals something about field/method rather than about fraud. They have clearly misleading write-up. Shouldn’t be mentioned in same breath as Sokal’s actually serious and substantive body work and criticism.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No. Just like I don’t agree with anti-vaxxers just because I think clinical trials should be pre-registered and conflict-of-interest is a growing issue for medical research
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.