I don’t think their work shows anything either way because it’s shoddy and misrepresented in the write-up and not well-done in the execution. I don’t know the people. They may be well-meaning and got caught up. Ironically, that’s an actual problem in academia and elsewhere!
Come on. It’s pretty clear what they have a problem with from their write-up and methods. Bullshit detection and misrepresented grievances (of theirs!!!!) are different. I’m all for the former.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No they misrepresented what they did. They use data fraud, act like it reveals something about field/method rather than about fraud. They have clearly misleading write-up. Shouldn’t be mentioned in same breath as Sokal’s actually serious and substantive body work and criticism.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.