Isn’t it?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
contrast this judgement and intuition call with the ProPublica report on Pulse shooting. They didn’t have the complete policies so they essentially did nothing. Rationalists want to centralize control over things that are illegible and can’t be centralized.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cc
@science__4__all@MonsieurPhi (I won't comment yet, but here it is for you)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our algos would have destroyed us by now. If we aren't careful they'll get a chance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't help feeling we've been warned about this... in like every near future SciFi throughout the 80s https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086567/ …
-
That's one thing I think WarGames 2 does better than the original
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Evidently, yes, an algorithm that only follows stupid rules is not desirable. But using this isolated example to argue in favor of breaking rules is cherry-picking. Breaking rules is sometimes desirable. But breaking rules (for instance speeding) is usually *not* desirable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We will have to invent computers with "skin in the game"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.