At this point, any other suggestion besides some form of verifiable paper trail plus meaningful audit means that the person either doesn’t understand voting, computers, people, their intersection—or likely doesn’t understand any of it.
https://twitter.com/jonathanstray/status/1023611761973506048 …
-
-
Optical scan ballots with meaningful audit processes are a perfectly reasonable method.https://twitter.com/richard_rathe/status/1023909436925112320 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe (though I don't believe) your analysis will leave many scratching their heads. Excellent analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The system of voting is less relevant than the humans running the system. Trust must exist in the humans before any technical solution can work.
-
Paper ballots reduce the number of people you have to trust, and reduce the extent to which you have to trust them, and let you audit afterwords if you decide you still don't trust them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't care if security assurance uses lasers to immutably etch diamonds in an underground vault. Web voting has to be safe, secure, easy-to-use, and convenient. Accurate voting provides fast and responsive voter signals for improved governing decisions.
-
Remember, the current requirement is a 10-year roadmap to transition to convenient web voting for all. Ironically to be designed and printed out on paper. Lots of paper!

End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
