Yes, that’s their business model.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @opinion_joe
you’d save a lot more money by just not publishing on Forbes than you would by not paying your suburban library tax
8 replies 62 retweets 883 likes -
-
no. that's simply not true.
6 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Which part is simply not true, exactly?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @morb_au @TerrinaMajnoona and
halah Retweeted Forbes Communications
Felix is back tracking and admits he was wrong.https://twitter.com/ForbesPR/status/1021775503244619776 …
halah added,
Forbes Communications @ForbesPRReplying to @felixsalmonThe claim that the contributor who wrote the library article paid us to publish his piece is indisputably false – and reckless. All of our editorial contributors, including this writer, are on a paid contract. Had we been contacted, we would have refuted this falsehood.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Did you guys take the article down?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_halah
I saw! Thanks for the correction. Any chance you could share with us how much traffic that article got, and maybe even how much one gets paid for that much traffic? Even approximate numbers would be very interesting.
11:01 AM - 24 Jul 2018
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.