Harder to find a group of people more *intentional* about "denying" an atrocity in order to pave the way for more violence than holocaust-deniers. I mean happened in Europe, within living memory, with more documentation than almost any other mass killing.https://www.recode.net/2018/7/18/17575156/mark-zuckerberg-interview-facebook-recode-kara-swisher …
-
-
Also, it' 2018. If the CEO of Facebook thinks Holocaust-deniers are just a bunch of distateful people having an honest disagreement with other people, and then has to clarify












That's besides the what to do question.Show this thread -
I wrote a whole article about "marketplace of ideas" for
@WIRED where I explain why "let good speech counter bad speech" doesn't work (if it ever really did) in the digital age. This isn't an endorsement for banning it all though. https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-issue-tech-turmoil-new-censorship/ … https://twitter.com/gidimeister/status/1020295306028683264 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s fairly simple: show your work. If the support for your thesis is the protocols of the elders of Zion, then it needs to be shitcanned by the host. The hardest thing about the web is that any crazy idea can be supported, even if a dead end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in fact, they LOVE to play ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it's the same thing as the bully on the playground shoving you face-first into the dirt and then saying "aw, we were just playing" when confronted about it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s “tricky” because in the final analysis it amounts to censorship; dangerous slippery slope.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.