Whenever you use any of these dna services, you go through multiple versions of "Are you prepared for the results? Because your parent(s) might not be biologically connected." Using it in this context negates informed consent.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are ways this could be done well and with privacy in mind, meaning only used for this. The non-biological-parent issue is real, but that's letting the perfect be the enemy of the good when you could reconnect most parents with most kids.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The data could fall into the hands of ICE. It could be used to implicate other relatives. It would make getting adopted kids bsck more difficult.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your argument is stronger than the dominant "don't use DNA" or "engenics is bad m'kay" reactions. DNA has helped many families reunite already, but you're spot-on: we shouldn't need this at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not DNA testing but "direct to consumer" genetic testing is full of issues. Who is to consent for the children to be tested? This is merely capitalizing on human suffering. Cannot agree more that this not the place nor the time to suggest this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.