Folks, conversations occur between people. If the other party turns over the conversation (or has phone confiscated without deleting messages) there is no encryption solution to this. Also that has nothing to do with Signal. Or encryption, really.
https://twitter.com/kendilaniannbc/status/1004918342698852358 …
-
-
If you’re messaging people, you’re messaging people. Encryption is to thwart easy mass surveillance from a distance. Is noy relevant to all the other issues. Does not make them magically disappear!https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1005107869702750208 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Ppl just don't get that e2e encryption is exactly that. If you have access to one of the e's there a damn good chance it's game over
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@samueloakford ephemeral messaging is to keep your own device clean. Once you have sent a message it is no longer in your control and there’s nothing you can do about except proactive minimization of the utility of the: message; content, and metadata. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
look at how effective DRM is. It's equivalent to delivering encrypted content to adversaries.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
) but the key point is the same. If the other party isn’t willing to/can’t keep your secret, encryption is not relevant.