Something similar with Manafort: he sent messages and the recipients turned them over. In his case, he was also backing them up to iCloud in plaintext (
) but the key point is the same. If the other party isn’t willing to/can’t keep your secret, encryption is not relevant.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Makes post-hoc discovery hard/impossible but there’s always screenshots. Encryption isn’t a magic amnesia potion https://twitter.com/samueloakford/status/1005099576603357184 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
If you’re messaging people, you’re messaging people. Encryption is to thwart easy mass surveillance from a distance. Is noy relevant to all the other issues. Does not make them magically disappear!https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1005107869702750208 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The replies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But screen shots?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Wait, you mean even if I tell someone secrets through Signal, they can still tell other people those secrets? Huge if true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes sense
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TL;DR - Three can keep a secret if two are dead.
-
Putin's 2nd Maxim.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
