This one poor woman worked on her still life constantly for the whole month, and then 1 week before the show she just had to finish a few things. So she took a couple photos, and took the painting home, then brought it back the next day finished. Nazi Realist became suspicious.
-
Show this thread
-
"How did you finish this? Did you come in last night?" Squinting at her like this woman had murdered someone in a tiny British village. "No, I uh..." she realizes she's screwed, "took a photo of it and.." Nazi Realist loses it,"There is no WAY I am allowing this in my show!"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Right then and there she throws this woman's art out of one of her most important shows, because this woman used a photo for just 1% of the working time on the painting. Nazi Realist was LIVID that anyone would dare not maintain the purity of the old masters and DARE use Photos.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
This is not the only example. I went to a conference where *every* presenter ranted for 50% of their talks about how terrible photos were. They all wanted to bring back "the Salon", which is actually the definition of an authoritarian state backed art show.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Every one of these painters though couldn't tell you when Cadmium or the tin tube was invented. Hint: It's after camera lucida *and* after photography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Goffe_Rand … They were very selective in their "without devices" it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
There were even some who had no idea that Rembrandt used a massive studio manufacturing operation to produce most of his paintings. They just thought dude sat there and painted all of The Night Watch by himself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_Watch …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
These Nazi Realists believed that they were maintaining the purity of classic art like some kind of artistic Society for Creative Anachronism. The were really just perpetuating and maintaining a false history that produced a propaganda they could believe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
These artists get away with it because in American society we view artists as some kind of spiritual morally good people who are cool and *never* would be Nazis like...Hitler...who was totally an artist. Like, how could an artist *possibly* want to destroy a student?!?!?!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
But in this tiny chunk of the art world, there's a group of artists who totally believe in this purity of art that thinks the "Old Masters" never used any devices and painted "naturally" (while _they_ use pigments ground into alkali refined linseed oils and put in tin tubes).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @zedshaw
Is there some movement that does it all “naturally”, like they start from the ground up and build their own paint, brushes and canvas?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, there is a guy who's big into this, and is also one of the worst of them: https://lilipubsorders.com/products/daniel-graves-old-world-portraiture … Here is a video where he demonstrates exactly that, then proceeds to do a painting that sucks and has all kinds of issues with it.
-
-
Replying to @zedshaw
Amazing (and I’m rolling my eyes as hard as I can when uttering that word)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pjaspers
I'm torn on it. From a hacking and history nerd view this is AWESOME and I want to try that. Like, totally recreate a painting from scratch only using ancient materials. From a painter view this is dumb 'cause like I can just buy the paint and get to painting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.