You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
1. When the flowers are in bloom do small paintings of them from the same light direction. 2. When they'd get a commission they'd reuse these flowers as reference and basically copy them. 3. These were kept secret, with assistants being yelled at for not locking "the cabinet".
That, my friends, is systematization--or industrialization if you want to make people hate being good at making a product--so to say artists hate using systems is ludicrous. It's an entirely modern idea born out of the boomer's obsession with Freudian/Jungian psychology in art.
In fact, every time I see someone whine and complain about being forced to bow down to The Man and create a design system, I almost always catch them using a homegrown system to get their work done faster. Macros, templates, tricks, brushes, special software, everything.
So the idea that systematization of art is somehow anti-artistic is bullshit, and it's always been bullshit. Artists for millennia were professionals who made products and wanted quality, and to create that quality product they crafted systems & manufacturing operations.
Just go read about Rembrandt's workshop and others from that era and you see it's a manufacturing operation. The atelier system of education is based on this even, where students learn aspects of painting by doing them in an assembly line style.
And if design and art has never been capitalist, propagandist, or authoritarian then why are there so many paintings of kings? Let's face it, art has never been socialist or for the people. It's always been self-serving and courting the favor of the powerful.pic.twitter.com/GMirOW9CEp
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
