I think also there's no way any mere mortal could possibly be considered "relevant" compared to many of the famous movie stars and musicians who get 40k-100k likes on posts of their dogs. Many of these platforms have really just become marketing tools for old media.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Like on my account my max likes is around 800, and I have about 4800 followers. Taylor Swift has 126 MILLION followers and posts get 500k likes and she most likely dumps about 2 million a year just on marketing budget. Since instagram makes verification a competition, no way.
Show this thread -
Instagram also outsources the determination of verifiability to incredibly low level employees, when really it should be a high level editorial choice. It's kind of like if a newspaper outsourced choosing what articles reach the front page to a call center in the Philipines.
Show this thread -
I think the bait and switch of all platforms is they start off with no algorithm so everyone feels important to attract users, then once they have users they switch to a "curated" feed to attract advertisers and famous people.
Show this thread -
But, overall I'm pretty happy with the tiny number of followers I have now on instagram. I have no illusions at all that my paintings of flowers should be even remotely as popular as any of the famous people on there. I'm sort of amazed I have that many even.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.