I've been doing this new thing where I draw the amature of the rectangle on a canvas, then just draw everything in a still life as if it mostly fits in there already. Totally works for still life paintings since nobody actually knows what the original scene looked like, BUT:
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @zedshaw
I don't quite understand this. You draw a rectangle on the canvas and then expand beyond it in the actual painting? Does this help with composition?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @southpolesteve
The canvas is already some kind of rectangle. Most people use a simple composition method called "rule of 3rds" where you divide it in a 1/3rd grid, then put stuff at the intersections. The AotR is where you draw guiding lines from corners and edges: http://www.dynamicsymmetryart.com/the-armature-of-the-rectangle.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zedshaw @southpolesteve
The best thing about the AotR is that most people don't notice the painting has been organized along those lines, yet it seems like it's composed and organized. It also works no matter what the aspect ratio, which doesn't work for Ro3rds on say 1:1 or super wide canvases.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is very cool, and once you know about it you start to see it everywhere in paintings after about...1800? Sometimes a little earlier, but that's the general rise of AotR. In general with composition I've found it's either "has *some* kind of logic" or "purposefully illogical"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.