One of the great sins of computer science curriculum is making students think that classes are required to have OOP. Thanks, Java teachers!
I’d go so far as saying it’s a crime to pretend OOP is anything more than a convention for packaging software with zero math basis or truth at all. Key among those crimes is pretending functions and “methods” are wildly different for no reason other than a shibboleth.
-
-
I got so much anxiety from other devs making me feel like I didn’t “get” it when I saw that the emperor had no clothes.
-
Programmers are fascists. They don’t care about actual technical clarity or quality just whether their regime wins. Python programmers actually said I didn’t know computer science when I challenged their “impossible to run Py2 and Py3” like Church-Turing Thesis never existed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alexander Stepanov has brought mathematical justifications to object oriented generic programming. Check out his work!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like how Python makes the "self" explicit in the method-calls, making this functions=methods non-duality more blatant. It's easier to be more hand-wavy in other languages that don't make it so literal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hate Java cultists who flip out if you don’t conform to the holy gospel of factories.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.