Wait a minute! Read this article: http://nautil.us/issue/32/space/men-are-better-at-maps-until-women-take-this-course … Now, why isn't this considered Aphantasia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia If so, then read this: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-47830256 … If men in tech have Aphantasia. and they do well, then doesn't that make the former test invalid?
-
-
Aphantasia doesn’t mean you aren’t good at 3D rotations or drawing or painting. It just means you don’t “see” it happen in your minds eye like a movie or a dream while rotating or before you make a drawing or painting.
-
I know that, yet here’s a test used to exclude people (mostly women) based on the idea that they won’t be good at it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yet, read that article, and you've got a test that seems to only exclude women despite, well, like you said, tons of dudes sucking at art, mental imagery, and math, going right into it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.