I was in the Army during the Clinton era. For all you youngin’s (and Democrats who secretly hate soldiers because you’re an anti Vietnam protestor who kept voting for the politicians who sent soldiers to Vietnam) out there Clinton was determined to reduce the size of the military
-
Show this thread
-
Right when he became President Clinton-the same guy who repeatedly sexually harassed women and protected billionaire pedo Epstein-figured out he could throw soldiers out for sexual harassment after the Tailhook Scandal. So what did the super “fair” MJ system do? Went INSANE.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
The Military Justice courts proceeded to define Sexual Harassment at an insane level nobody could meet. Then literally threw people in jail over it, threw them out of the military, and with almost zero evidence most of the time. The proof is, after a few years the law changed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Or, more specifically, an actual law was written that was fair and based on the civilian definition of SH rather than just whatever the local base commander decided would help him meet his quota of soldiers thrown out. Then came the fitness and drug tests!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
I’ll tell you about a soldier in my uniy named Glunt to demonstrate. He went to training and on the 2nd week was failed for not doing enough pushups. He was 6’4” tall so the guy measuring him decided he didn’t go down far enough and threw Glunt out. Then, the “fair” MJ system:
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
He gets back to out unit and they start to throw him out. It used to be you could fail a school but nope, gotta meet the quotas. So the commander writes Glunt up with 1 offense: Failed a school Glunt signs this, and being a good supply clerk, keeps a copy. Then guess what?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
He comes back a few weeks later to do his final exit—losing all benefits with only a year left—and goes to sign the final document, looks at his list of offenses, that he supposedly pled guilty to and: They added about 10 more *after* he signed. This is super illegal. Why?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
He pled guilty to one crime, failing a school. But the base commander and his commander didn’t think it was enough AND Clinton had his quotas, so to meet quotas they just tacked on a bunch of extra shit and hoped he didn’t keep his copy. Oh, but Glunt was a supply clerk.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
This is like you get arrested for being a billionaire pedo like Clinton’s buddy Epstein, and instead of getting some weird deal that only a Prince and former President could broker, you get 10 other crimes added on after the trial and go to jail for 20 extra years instead of 1.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Who did this to Glunt? Why, the supposedly bery fair and excellent Military Justice JAG officer and his commander. They got the papers with one crime, presented it to the JAG boss, he thought it wasn’t enough, then doctored the record to get Glunt nearly thrown in prison. What?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
If he didn’t habe his copy he might have gone to jail over some fucking pushups because a crazy President had quotas on how many soldiers to throw out that year. Luckily he did, and in exchange for keeping quiet they hooked him up and cleaned his record. That’s military justice
-
-
The reason Military Justice is a joke as it’s run with almost zero oversight from external entities and judged by people in power who are motivated by promotions within the officer ranks, covering up war crimes by officers, and not actual justice. It’s barely any kind of court.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
So while maybe these soldiers did commit war crimes, I’m going object to the idea that the military has any kind of justice system. It’s a kangaroo court that works for the President to reshape the military, and only sometimes works to catch and prosecute real crimes.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.