When someone does attempt to "fix" an untrained skill with a proper training system it totally fixes the supposed genetically predisposed brain deficiency. It's almost as if...and bear with me here...like...smart people can learn new things? I might be crazy though.
-
Show this thread
-
In my case I experienced this with artists. In fact, I would do little studies of this when I could. If I told them I was a programmer they immediately acted like all my art sucked, no matter how good or bad it was actually. How do I know this? LOL, listen to this:
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
When someone would email me saying my art sucks I'd send them my very best drawing and say, "Yeah, can you do better than that?" They'd send me back something with flaws, but ALSO rip into my drawing with a critique. "It seems timid. Looks amateurish." Etc.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Problem is, I wasn't sending them a drawing I did. I was sending them a drawing from one my teachers who is WAY more accomplished and better at drawing than both of us. The *belief* that it was my drawing--a programmer's--made them see it as full of flaws. There's more.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Another test I'd do is use some form of cheating to do the drawing. My favorite is a camera lucida, which gets it about as perfect as you could, or copy a photo. I know for a *fact* the drawing is dead accurate because science. But, I'd send that to the "experts" and...
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
"This is the wrong perspective. That tree over there can't possibly be that tall. There's no way you'd see two light sources like that." Nope, can't tell perspective on trees and it's through a fucking perfect lens on a $10k camera brosniff. Did you forget there's clouds?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
The final experiment was that I'd just take a photo and put it through one of those photo->painting algorithms and *still* they'd find "errors" because I'm a programmer. Meanwhile, they'd send me paintings full of errors, or gush endlessly over other artists full or "errors".
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
I'd also notice that if I didn't tell a teacher I was a programmer they treated me better. One teacher learned I was a programmer about 1/2 through, then at the end of the class told me I should stop doing art. Problem was, at the beginning he was showing my work to the class.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
The gist of it is, these art teachers were treating me much the same way a lot of douchebags in STEM treat women. Their belief was that it was impossible for a programmer to learn to paint because I didn't have a "natural talent", which is similar to genetic predisposition.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @zedshaw
I was the reverse of that story... a painter that learned to code... now it’s my full-time gig (Thanks in large part to your courses)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Neither is that difficult conceptually. They both just require practice in application of about 5 basic concepts. That's usually why it's comical when a coder is all about learning the "concept of programming" because that's actually the easiest part. Application is hard.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.