Photography is fairly similar to Painting, but they have better more exact terminology for the same things. You've got value range, focal point, composition, hue, exposure, etc. But after that and the few technical words and concepts it's not that many concepts.
-
-
The significance of this idea is this: If these things all require extensive practice to become viable skills, then telling someone they just need to learn the concepts is denying the fact that a vast majority of what makes you a "programmer", "painter", or "musician" is cliches
Show this thread -
And, not just cliches but being able to apply the concepts to replicate cliches. I mean, programmers are fucking notorious as hell for denying people jobs simply for not putting a space before the ( on a fucking if-statement so don't tell me they're ruled by cliches.
Show this thread -
Additionally, I think a lot of the people who claim you only need to learn the concepts couldn't actually list out these concepts. I think most programmers couldn't replicate P" or a Lisp from memory, even though they're simple. I've never heard a designer even say "value".
Show this thread -
Finally, this questions the wisdom that you CANNOT learn the concepts from simply practicing. If you are judged by your skill in performing cliches, and the concepts are fairly simple, but only understood through experience, then...why can't you learn them while you practice?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.