Zed A. Shaw, Painter

Apparently Prince Andrew and that law professor had a hand in help Epstein get this plea deal, which weirdly seems to protect those two. AND, AND, the deal was made without asking the victims (like 40 girls) if they were alright with the deal, which is required? I guess so.

To put this into perspective: Imagine I rob banks with my crew of 5. One day I get caught and I can make a plea deal. So, the DA goes, "Alright, we'll give you one year and we won't go after your 4 co-conspirators." No fucking way. The law is actually the reverse.

The normal law is if you get caught committing a crime with 4 other people you all do time, even if all you did was drive the car or answer phones. They do this with drug crime all the time, throwing women in jail when they arrest their boyfriends: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/mandatory-minimum-sentencing-girlfriend-problem-757690/ …

And they are ruthless about this. They don't just stop prosecuting a whole organization because they did one deal with one dude. The drag everyone in jail, even tangentially related. Yet.....this deal absolves 4 other people of criminal prosecution w/o their own deals? WTF?

So in this case, the DA caught Epstein, arrested him, then cut him and 4 people a deal, but they never ... arrested the 4 other people to work out the deal. See the problem? How can they get a plea deal without an arrest? Or even questioning? Takes some power to do that.

The kind of power that really only the President and Royalty have. Keep in mind, Trump was not President then. You only have Prince Andrew, and....the Clintons. Bill was a former president and Hillary was Sec of State I believe. *That's* the kind of power that gets that deal.

I don't buy the specific claim of Clintons, but definitely agree this is whack and powerful people were protected.