You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
What's interesting is that, to learn these 4 things you have to learn a ton of additional subjects from the classics. For example, if you learn to paint a portrait you need to learn a lot of art history so you know what a "portrait" should look like.
To learn to read/write at a journalist level you have to study many authors and literature. To code you need to at least get through algebra, maybe calc, or learn those through ode. To play 1 instrument you have to learn music history too. That covers a huge set of classics.
I feel its still kinda poor because it leaves you with no physics or chemistry, or biology (other than anatomy, for painting) - or even economics and history - you'd cover a bit for journalism, but not enough. And you kind of need those for a basic grasp of reality.
Sure, there's not a lot of direct science, but you're forgetting that painting includes chemistry (make your own paint, pigments) and physics (optics could be an entire semester through replicating old masters like vermeer's optics tricks). Not to mention astronomy.
As someone who had all those boxes checked, none of those are necessarily true.
I think you read "should" into that when it's coated in thick layers "could". If you didn't learn those things then you only skimmed the surface of those topics. I did all 4 and learned all these things and am still learning.
I have to disagree on art and music in particular. History is sometimes made and not by having any knowledge of the classics of the past.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
