The issue with the critique is that he criticizes "meaningless correlational studies" but still uses them to come up with his conclusion. I do sleep optimization in private practice with CEOs & VC. I rec. 7-8 min, 8-10 with heavy physical/mental activity.https://twitter.com/DrSepah/status/1189694113714622464?s=20 …
-
-
-
I've been thinking about this for the last few days and you're right. Now the conclusion reads: "We have literally no idea about the optimal for long-term health sleep duration." + added explanation Do you have an issue with this or any other parts of the essay? :)pic.twitter.com/CEnBWQ4vHr
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
More people should be critiquing Walker's book. That is science. If it's "popscience" as you called it, walker should explicitly state that. People are taking it as gospel and that's the problem. People, in general, have a problem with QUESTIONING.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for saving our time! 8 hours sleep should be heavily promoted. Hopefully, we’ll see more evidence-based, flawless papers/books than the one of MW. The debate reminds the climate change one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cc:
@ouraringThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
TBH, if any of us wrote a book *that* dense, we might make a few minor erroneous claims.
-
Exactly
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There is absolutely no way that Matt Walker starred the conversation about the importance of sleep, that ignores over 2000 years of writing about sleep dating back to Aristotle in 350BC
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.