Amazon “but no profit!” critics don’t appreciate how rare the business is that can effectively deploy (massively increasing amounts of) capital without using (questionable) buybacks and (questionable) acquisitions to soak up the excess.
-
-
Replying to @zackkanter
What makes AMZN capital deployment different than a crap acquisition? Both provide top-line growth. But both do not earn their cost of capital (ie. Earn profits)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @zackkanter
Cash flow from ops not relevant. Yes they have made a bit of net income. A bad acq'n still has a bit of net income attached to it too. Let's talk in 10 years
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QltySmallCaps @zackkanter
Why would cash flow from ops not be relevant? Bezos is intentionally keeping gross margin low to take oxygen out of his competition and reinvesting in the business with great success. Why would you want to turn off a compounding growth engine?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jeetsidhu_ @zackkanter
Cash flow from operations does not represent cash flow from existing/continuing businesses. AWS and data center build out are very expensive; depreciation is a very real expense for capital intensive businesses. CFO excludes depreciation
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
agree, depreciation is real - so is stock-based comp. will pull numbers and dig in further.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.