1. My take on the Hampton Creek situation: it's the equivalent of leaving reviews for your own product. Black hat practice, but many do it.
2. Clearly wasn't done to inflate revenue (=0.12% of tot rev). Also, prob wasn't done purely for 'quality control.' It's a launch strategy.
-
-
3. Common practice, ethical gray area. But when you have outside investors, you absolutely must disclose. No gray area here. That's the rub.
-
4. It's a good reminder of an interview I saw with
@reidhoffman on the subject of integrity. Appearance matters.pic.twitter.com/18j2NUR1yR
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.