Caveman: "Fire is a moral imperative. Every protectionist regulation that impedes it costs lives."
https://twitter.com/zackkanter/status/721797964079833092 …
-
-
Replying to @asteroid_saku
@sknthla@zackkanter Most people are in a lower power relationship to technology/industry, hence need for a balanced "protectionism."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mariachong
@mariachong@sknthla I think we just have differing philosophies. I think regulation should be in response to demonstrable problems.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zackkanter
@zackkanter Possible benefits = remove all regulations → Would we say this for medicine, international adoption...sushi bars?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mariachong
@mariachong it seems there is plenty of statistical evidence supporting regulation for medicine, etc. I don't get your argument.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zackkanter
@zackkanter It's really sunny in Seattle so in closing: it's ludicrous that: new + possibly good = "we get no regulation or due diligence"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mariachong
@zackkanter Also, good discussion. Will be considering your points and adding their perspective to my own belief about this. Appreciate it!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mariachong likewise! Enjoy the sun.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.