There’s a parallel universe out there in which the United States ran on AWS. The opportunity cost to the nation in this one is incalculable.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/technology/dod-jedi-contract.html …
-
I agree, never said it was. But I’m thinking that running on AWS vs Azure won’t change how the govt operates. The end result would be pretty much the same whether they had picked either. Cloud vs COBOL systems is a big change, but AWS vs Azure isn’t, afaik.
It isn’t about feature parity now (ignoring the fact that it isn’t even close today) - the government will be running on Azure ~forever. The arc of technology is long, and Microsoft bends towards terrible and expensive.
-
-
I don’t know. Satya’s MSFT isn’t the old Borg, and AWS isn’t exactly perfect either. Time will tell, but competition between the hyperscalers is keeping the others honest and relatively similar.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you elaborate further on this, other than referencing decisions by startups
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.