Would you rather have marquee logos on the Azure page or the paper billion dollar valued startups? For the govt it is probably about signaling and former is a safer choice similar to old saying 'nobody got fired for buying IBM'. This decision is certainly not based on merit.
-
-
-
Paper-valued startups, like Datadog. Regardless, AWS has both.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm less opposed to this. They are def trying to catch up But actually have heard a bunch of very strong engineers talk about azure positively.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't the US goverment closer to a legacy company so azure makes more sense?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Zack. This is one contract. The government and DoD will surely be multi-cloud. I think it even says so in the article. There’s so many reasons for the gov not to only use one provider.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The US Govt still runs on Windows. Client is half of the picture
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would think that for establish business, is the safe smart choice. What Microsoft cannot produce, it will buy. That limits the risk of the platform dissapering, even more now that the contract from the pentagon
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Way off on this. Did reread your What is Amazon piece earlier this week. Was just as good the second time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Azure was the official color of my college sorority (Alpha Delta Pi)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.