why does everyone always act like the money can only go one direction in. If you have someone in category 3 toss them out of the cap table - get someone to buy out their positions ASAP.
-
-
Replying to @PaulRoales
If you’re doing well as a company, it’s easy to find buyers - it isn’t as easy to find sellers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zackkanter
so maybe this needs to be a standard term going forward, ability to force someone off the cap table. If founders can be fired, no reason why the VC's get their seat at the table for life.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulRoales @zackkanter
Why would I invest in a company if I don’t get to decide when to sell my shares?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @typesfast @zackkanter
Because those are the only terms the company is offering. If the company is hot enough to get 10x founders voting shares, why not get the ability to fire bad investors?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulRoales @zackkanter
Who picks the price when the investors are fired?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @typesfast @zackkanter
Wouldn’t it be simple enough to liquidate their shares along with a new fundraise that included a few new outside investors to provide some pricing objectivity?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulRoales @zackkanter
So the company decides what price I have to sell at?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @typesfast @PaulRoales
What Ryan is getting at is that it sounds nice in theory but it's ~impossible to codify in such a way that it couldn't be gamed, so no worthwhile investor would agree to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zackkanter @typesfast
I disagree - I see the only reason it does not exist is historical norms. Lots of things in the modern term sheet are complex - and nothing makes this kind of term or transaction impossible here.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Any company that hits escape velocity could/would force buybacks of shares (financed with revenue or debt) from early investors. It would decimate venture returns, which are driven by a few massively successful companies. Agreeing to this structure would be self-destructive.
-
-
Replying to @zackkanter @typesfast
But there is plenty of capital standing by to get in on startups right now. So the VC old boys club where they can do two deals a year and sail 60 days a summer gets destroyed and managers have to actually provide value to get all that glorious upside? Sounds great
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The public would love to invest in startup companies before they become unicorns again...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.