It never ceases to amaze me how a seemingly intelligent person can talk about the dangers of an authoritarian administration in one breath and advocate for expanded powers in the next, without a thought of how it could backfire.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/opinion/sunday/free-speech-social-media-violence.html …
-
-
oh man i really want them to fund a competitor so they understand what’s it’s actually like to run this kind of company
-
It’ll be less hilarious when it’s still around in 150 years and has a government-granted monopoly on some legacy piece of business and loses trillions of dollars a year.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is what I've come to realize about even the most reputable media outlets: utterly clueless people writing with a tone of authority, hoping the audience is even more clueless (and they are).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The way the Postal Service competes with FedEx and U.P.S" Anyone wanna tell Andrew that the growth of FedEx and UPS was only possible because the Postal Service is an abject failure of an organization? Market efficiencies lap government monopoly at every freaking turn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.