What makes you so certain?
Torn on the CA Uber/Lyft bill. On one hand, it would destroy ridesharing there and that would be unfortunate. On the other hand, would be really interesting to watch how people who believe drivers should be classified as employees respond when ridesharing implodes.
-
-
-
The entire model is dependent on eliminating the complexity associated with full time employees/employers.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder will they declare autonomous cars doing ride-sharing as employees too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least it would reduce Uber’s cash burn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait until you see what happens when you suggest to folks demanding action on climate change that they set their thermostat to 82.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If drivers make more as independent contractor (health, wage, return in excess of capital cost, etc) they will oppose being employees. Not viable biz. Just bridge model until self driving. Poor drivers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s the implicit argument ? That drivers shouldn’t be considered employees ? Or that the convenience driven by the model is valuable enough that ride sharing should be able to avoid considering drivers employees ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This account owner limits who can view their Tweets. %{learnmore}
-
-
plus... new shareholders demanding higher rates... the implosion rate and/or shift to it's a majority shared rides will compound
-
have already heard whispers of people taking... buses
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.