Occam's razor is almost always true when it comes to people's unethical behavior. Certainly true when it comes to SF housing policy.
This situation is much less frustrating when you realize that it isn’t an unintended consequence; there’s a contingent of the population that wants it to be extremely difficult and expensive to build new housing, and they’re doing a great job of it.https://twitter.com/rolandlisf/status/1161325060386201600 …
-
-
-
This account owner limits who can view their Tweets. %{learnmore}
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t that contingent the majority of property owners? New housing is basically them donating money to make the region even more overcrowded and even less like it used to be, whatever that means to them. Maybe the problem is with democracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why don’t people just build without asking for permission. Probably costs less to physically defend building site than fight for permits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This makes it more frustrating and frightening that these people are succeeding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should try building a house in Britain. Step one: agree to give 40% of your units away to “social housing”...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.