Also because software is something that emerges bottom-up, not something that can be designed from top
Fred Brooks on why ‘NoCode’ will probably ~never work: “[S]oftware is very difficult to visualize...[a software system cannot be described by] a layered two-dimensional object whose geometry reflects its essence.” (No Silver Bullet, 1986)pic.twitter.com/xJud5tlZbL
-
-
-
Good point. It’s moreso grown than built.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Future of low code are more textual DSLs that target the types of people who can work in Excel or people who can do sql. It’s about abstracting away env not text. Excel is the most used functional reactive programming env ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes I wonder if programming will soon be simple drag and drop powered by AI. And almost immediately I run into a problem of such frustrating nuance that I'm reminded if we could automate programming, we've probably already automated everything else
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It works if your expectations are in scope with what no-code can delivery. Want a quick and dirty MVP? It works. Want a production app with thousands of users? Maybe not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The more fundamental way to think about it is: if you had a huge team of 1000 engineers who were living in your computer and running 1000x real time, could they give you a good visualization on the fly? Then, what important things that they're doing can we not do today?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The take that AI is going to replace programmers in the near term is a personal favorite
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.