95.9% people should walk free of their heinous crimes because one of their peers has been suggested to be innocent. it doesn't make you smart or poignant. it simply means you're unable or unwilling to argue with nuance and just plead to people's moralities to prove a case.https://twitter.com/zackkanter/status/1139617701012242432 …
-
what should we do with the 4.1%, then? unless you have some super secret machine that tells us exactly who that 4.1% is and who is not, fairness dictates what the 4.1% gets should also go to the 95.9%. easy to grandstand and moralize, infinitely harder to execute.
Perhaps not putting people to death, permanently, could help reverse bad decisions once revealed by time and appeals.
-
-
that's probably a better call for the victims of those crimes, rather than bystanders, no? furthermore, it's better that the state take the grim responsibility of such, rather than sole individuals. again, you appear to moralize everything to fit your personal subjective morals
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.