Though I also agree that Jeff should give and it is not OK that he hasn't.
-
P.S. My view of journalists is their job is to tell interesting stories that are fair and that their audience finds relevant -- not to be optimistic or pessimistic per se. Here, the contrast is so natural and striking and the timing so soon after the divorce that it feels fair.
Headline: “Bloomberg BETA-backed {startup/founder 1} acquired for $2.2B, while Bloomberg BETA-backed {startup/founder 2} has done nothing and remains an outward-appearing abject failure.”
Factual 
Interesting
Engaging
Fair and meeting high journalistic standards?
-
-
If there were only two founders whose companies were tied at the hip for decades, probs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Believe me I have been on the receiving end of press I felt was unfair and so maybe my skin is thick now?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article is fair Zach. Article headlines are smart if they answer the first question that comes to readers mind. Ie when Netflix spoke out against GA re abortions it was indicated it was only studio that did in header a question many readers first thought off. Same in this cas
-
Most people are wondering did pre divorce Mackenzie Bezos do this and the answer is no/ Jeff Bezos no. It's a fact and it's a narrative that works fine like Roy said . If they compared her half as less than to someone else like another female philanthropist that's off base imho
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.