I agree with the statement when you bold what is in parens and put sirens around it. Outside of toy sample applications, we can't build lambdas in complete isolation. Honest question: Where is the tipping point/plane between employing FaaS purposely vs. losing sight in the hype?https://twitter.com/ben11kehoe/status/1097837796109234179 …
-
-
Replying to @SusanPotter
At iRobot, we've found that going completely serverless is 100% worth the trouble, both in figuring out how to scale interconnected webs of FaaS and managed services, and in dealing with currently-inadequate tooling
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @SusanPotter
Our production applications that support all connected Roombas (and there are a lot out there) are built on Lambda and about 30 other AWS services, with no EC2 or containers.
1 reply 5 retweets 12 likes
I seem to remember reading on twitter that you have ~21M devices running on a serverless infrastructure with ~$13k/mo in AWS costs and 2 engs overseeing the whole thing. Can't find the tweet anywhere, though - is that accurate?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.