also add whatever @benedictevans is saying
-
-
-
I’ve been as clear as I possibly can be that I agree with everything Zack says. it’s also not the long term question - you could make exactly the same point about Apple in the late 70s and early 80s. the question was not whether PCs become a thing, but who won from that.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Amongst non-straw man arguments it’s pretty consistently been: there’s a far better chance incumbents out scale turn before they grow into their multiple, than that Tesla will remain in front forever. At that point Tesla’s stock probably collapses because dominance is priced in.
-
Until an incumbent is willing to go with a clean sheet design, I don’t think it’ll happen. And by the time they’re willing to make that leap, it might be too late.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wasn’t there a “the batteries will wear out in two years. Replacing them will be horrifically expensive” phase as well?
-
Yep, and a “they’re only for eco-warriers, not car fans” phase, not to mention a “they’re _actually_ worse for the environment, don’t you know?” phase which still continues...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also history of anything and everything disruptive
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Don’t forget to add the government subsidies to lower the price for the buyer and distribute it across taxpayers lolz.
-
Do we include oil subsidies too?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.