Three helpful heuristics for filtering this in real-time: 1) if the outcome of the study supports a popular narrative, it probably won’t replicate. 2) if a headline says, “Science says...”, ignore the article. 3) there’s no such thing as nutrition science.https://twitter.com/roybahat/status/1041526006442389504 …
-
There's no science behind nutrition?
Small sample sizes, self-reported diets, virtually impossible to set strict control groups.
-
-
Sounds more like a critique of implementations/methodologies rather than a negation of the chemistry of nutrition.
-
Yes, of course it’s theoretically possible. Just may not be practically possible with today’s technology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.