1. I want to say a little bit about this @NoahCRothman piece, which accuses me and other journalists of missing the "textbook" deescalatory strategy behind Trump's killing of Qassem Soleimani.
Mostly, I want to ask: which textbooks are you reading?https://www.commentarymagazine.com/foreign-policy/middle-east/iran/why-the-press-got-iran-so-wrong/ …
-
-
5. What is the evidence for this claim? That Iran's immediate response was not as aggressive as it could have been. But the fact that Iran didn't immediately respond with violence doesn't mean that there won't be a more dangerous response down the linehttps://www.vox.com/world/2020/1/8/21056888/trump-iran-news-statement-war-victory …
Prikaži ovu nit -
6. If there's a "textbook" example of anything here, it's the way in which neoconservatives speak about their ideas as being the obvious conclusions of anyone familiar with history when in reality there are few ideologies with *less* support on the relevant academic literature.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
is this like that thing libertarians do where they say "econ 101" to justify their support for policies based on the simplified theories taught to high school students rather than the complexity and data of the real world?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Oh man... was curious what the hyperlink for "textbook method" there went to... Schelling? Art/Jervis reader? Literally any IR textbook? Nope... just his own piece written 5 days earlier...https://www.commentarymagazine.com/foreign-policy/middle-east/iran/has-iran-blinked/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.