Critiques of the enlightenment era’s conception of government:
-
-
“[If this kept happening across cultures], then this was something which was not absolutely absurd; otherwise, it would not reappear.”
Show this thread -
“Mythical stories are, or seem, arbitrary, meaningless, absurd, yet nevertheless they seem to reappear all over the world. A fanciful creation of the mind in one place would be unique – you would not find the same creation in a completely different place.”
Show this thread -
“It is, I think, absolutely impossible to conceive of meaning without order. There is something very curious in semantics, that the word ‘meaning’ is probably, in the whole language, the word the meaning of which is the most difficult to find.” What does “to mean” mean?
Show this thread -
“To speak of rules and to speak of meaning is to speak of the same thing; and if we look at all the intellectual undertakings of mankind, as far as they have been recorded all over the world, the common denominator is always to introduce some kind of order.”
Show this thread -
“If this represents a basic need for order in the human mind and since, after all, the human mind is only part of the universe, the need probably exists because there is some order in the universe and the universe is not chaos.”
Show this thread -
“What I have been trying to say is that there has been a divorce – a necessary divorce – between scientific thought and what I have called the logic of the concrete, that is, the respect for and use of the data of the senses, as opposed to images and symbols and the like.”
Show this thread -
“We are witnessing the moment when this divorce will perhaps be overcome or reverted.”
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


