yungdeleuze

What about Woody Harrelson's article do you find to be ugly or dangerous?

Not the article. The post-scarcity package.

My understanding of the "post-scarcity package" is that ours is the decision not between civilization and barbarism, but rather anarchism and annihilation. What is your understanding of the "post-scarcity package"?

Ideas = mutations, we don't know a priori if they are a virus, a cancer or blue eyes or a sixth-sense. The historical record of the post-scarcity infected tribe is one that has directly wiped away millions of human souls and zombified millions more. It has also impacted my family

Also, I don't accept your dichotomy. We can find better ways to compete when we are powerful. The ancient armies sometime would meet and not fight. The champions would.https://twitter.com/rdntola/status/1044649195024478209 …

There are so many ways for life to work out and this is why I don't like professional philosophers. They hypnotize themselves with their own mutations and collapse reality around a few ideas.

Doers > Thinkers

And within the context of thinkers, who is the most active — the sage or the philosopher?