yungdeleuze

What's in fact a greater likelihood is that neuroscientists confuse words for psychological properties, by mereological fallacy, mistaking property dualism as literally being features of the brain, thus designing flawed metrics and experiments for what constitutes intelligence.

The only reason Wittgenstein-ians are enjoying their words, is because we don't allow professional-post-scarcist-philosophers to act on theirs. I am happy to entertain ideas even from Zëri i Popullit if need be, does not stop me from finding the aesthetic ugly and dangerous.

What about Woody Harrelson's article do you find to be ugly or dangerous?

Not the article. The post-scarcity package.

My understanding of the "post-scarcity package" is that ours is the decision not between civilization and barbarism, but rather anarchism and annihilation. What is your understanding of the "post-scarcity package"?

Ideas = mutations, we don't know a priori if they are a virus, a cancer or blue eyes or a sixth-sense. The historical record of the post-scarcity infected tribe is one that has directly wiped away millions of human souls and zombified millions more. It has also impacted my family

Also, I don't accept your dichotomy. We can find better ways to compete when we are powerful. The ancient armies sometime would meet and not fight. The champions would.https://twitter.com/rdntola/status/1044649195024478209 …

There are so many ways for life to work out and this is why I don't like professional philosophers. They hypnotize themselves with their own mutations and collapse reality around a few ideas.